A Strange Crime in the Age of AI
In what may be the first recorded robot kidnapping attempt, a man in San Jose, California, tried to steal an $18,000 robotic server from Pho 21, a Vietnamese restaurant known for its high-tech dining experience. The suspect entered the establishment before opening hours, requested to use the restroom, and then attempted to carry the robot to his car. When restaurant employees noticed what was happening, they immediately intervened, physically wrestling the machine away from the would-be thief.
This unusual incident was reported by Dion Lim of ABC7 News, a renowned investigative journalist known for her in-depth coverage of crime in San Francisco’s high-crime areas. (Video) While the case is currently being treated as an attempted property theft, it sparks deeper philosophical, legal, and ethical debates about our evolving relationship with artificial intelligence and its role in society:
• Was this merely a case of stealing an expensive object, or does removing a robot designed for service constitute a new type of crime?
• Could advanced AI one day be legally recognized as more than property, similar to how human slaves were once denied but later granted legal personhood?
• Should there be stronger legal protections for AI systems that play a critical role in businesses, healthcare, and other industries?
Though this incident may seem comical at first glance, it is a sign of deeper societal changes that will demand urgent answers in the coming years.

Robots and the Law: Theft or Kidnapping?
As of today, the law treats robots as property, not as autonomous entities. This means that even in the most advanced AI systems, theft is still just theft—a violation against the robot’s owner rather than the robot itself.
However, legal scholars and ethicists are beginning to question whether AI-integrated machines deserve a different classification than standard objects. Consider:
• A smartphone or computer is an inanimate object, but a robot that interacts with humans, learns from its environment, and performs service tasks is fundamentally different.
• If someone steals a self-driving delivery vehicle, an AI-powered surgical assistant, or a caregiving robot for the elderly, the impact extends beyond the financial loss. It disrupts human lives, work, and in some cases, even patient care.
The San Jose robot theft case challenges legal definitions:
• Would laws need to change to classify AI-integrated machines as something more than property but less than human?
• Should crimes against AI-powered machines be elevated beyond simple property crimes due to their role in human society?
• If an AI system is advanced enough to “perceive” harm, could there be ethical arguments for treating its removal or destruction as “wrong” in a moral sense?
Though these ideas may seem futuristic, they are already topics of debate in legal and technological circles.
A Historical Perspective: Parallels to Human Slavery

The idea that robots should be considered “more than property” might seem radical, but history provides a troubling parallel: the treatment of enslaved individuals as mere possessions.
Before the abolition of slavery, enslaved individuals were legally classified as property, not persons. If a slave was kidnapped, harmed, or stolen, the crime was recognized only in terms of financial loss to the slave owner, rather than an offense against the enslaved person themselves.
One famous case is that of Solomon Northup, a free African American who was kidnapped in 1841 and sold into slavery. His status as a legally free man was ignored, and he was treated as property, suffering brutal conditions for over 12 years before regaining his freedom.
While AI is not sentient (at least, not yet), the legal comparison raises important philosophical and ethical questions:

• Could robots eventually transition from “owned machines” to legally recognized entities, similar to how enslaved people were eventually granted legal personhood?
• If AI develops self-awareness, memory, and emotional recognition, would removing them from their environment be considered an act of harm?
• Should AI ever have a right to “choose” where it exists, works, or interacts?
The Pho 21 incident might be the first step in an evolving legal conversation that forces humanity to confront whether AI should forever remain property—or if one day, it might be something more.
The Economic and Ethical Implications of AI Theft
Beyond philosophical questions, the theft of a robotic worker has real-world economic and ethical consequences.
• The Pho 21 robot was a significant investment at $18,000, representing an expensive and critical tool for the restaurant’s business.
• Unlike a stolen laptop or cash register, a service robot has a unique function—it performs labor, interacts with customers, and serves as an automated worker.
• The thief likely had no way to reprogram or repurpose the robot, meaning that its theft would have resulted in its complete loss, rendering it useless outside the restaurant.
Potential Future Legal Protections for AI
With robots becoming commonplace in industries like food service, retail, healthcare, and transportation, governments may need to introduce stricter laws governing their theft or destruction.
Some possible legal changes could include:
• Enhanced penalties for stealing AI-integrated machines, due to their economic and societal impact.
• Legal recognition of “AI worker disruption”, similar to laws protecting service animals from interference.
• Ethical guidelines for AI maintenance and treatment, ensuring that businesses use robots responsibly.
As automation becomes more integrated into society, governments will need to redefine legal frameworks to accommodate this new reality.
The Future: Will Robots Ever Have Rights?
Legal scholars and futurists have long debated whether AI should ever be granted legal personhood or rights.
While current AI lacks true consciousness, some researchers believe that in the future, AI may develop forms of self-awareness, emotional recognition, and independent decision-making.
If that happens, will laws need to change?
Some real-world legal precedents suggest that this conversation is already beginning:
• Corporate Personhood: Corporations are legally considered persons in many countries, allowing them to own assets, sue, and be sued. Could an advanced AI system one day be granted similar status?
• Animal Rights Laws: Some countries, like Germany and Switzerland, recognize that animals are not merely property and must be treated ethically. Could AI eventually be granted similar protections?
• Emotional Bonds with AI: Studies show that people form deep emotional attachments to digital assistants like Siri, Alexa, and ChatGPT. If people care about their AI, should those AI be protected from unnecessary harm or destruction?
For now, the Pho 21 incident remains a case of property theft. But as robots become more advanced and more embedded in daily life, the debate over their legal, economic, and ethical status is only just beginning.

Final Thoughts: The Dawn of a New Era
The attempted “kidnapping” of a robot in San Jose may seem like a strange, almost humorous event—but it symbolizes a much larger shift in human society.
• As AI and robotics advance, we must rethink how we classify, regulate, and protect these machines.
• Legal definitions will need to evolve to address new types of AI-related crimes and ethical concerns.
• The distinction between “property” and “entity” will blur, forcing society to reconsider what it means to “own” intelligence.
Are we witnessing the first case of robot kidnapping—or the first sign of a future where AI demands its own rights?
As robots become more integrated into our daily lives, incidents like this at Pho 21 raise important ethical and legal questions about the status of AI in society. Are advanced robots merely property, or do they deserve certain rights and protections as they take on increasingly human-like roles? This debate is at the core of the Human vs. AI discussion—one that Sparknify continues to explore through events like the Human vs. AI Night Market and Film Festival taking place in Silicon Valley from May 16 to May 17, 2025. Join us for a thought-provoking experience that blends technology, culture, and storytelling. Early bird tickets are available for free — secure yours today on the event website!
Comments